Studio diary — two discovery slots open from 12 October. Start an enquiry

Established practice, small room

Four people. One project at a time, occasionally two. The person who writes your strategy is the person who answers your email on a Thursday afternoon.

We take on brand systems, product interfaces and the writing that holds both together.

We make the case
before we make
the artwork.

Thyme & Quill is a brand and product studio for organisations that have outgrown their first identity and need the next one to survive contact with a real roadmap.

Brand systems Product interface Editorial & naming Design ops handover
Open-plan studio with long meeting tables and daylight through tall windows
The room
Two designers, one strategist, one writer. No account layer between you and the work.
How we meet
A standing weekly review, plus a shared board you can read at any hour without asking.
Typical length
Six to fourteen weeks for a full engagement. Shorter pieces are scoped as diagnostics.

Method

Four stages, each one ending in something you can use.

Every stage closes with an artefact, not a status update. If a stage cannot produce its artefact, we stop and say so rather than rolling the problem forward into production.

01

Read the business

Interviews with the people who sell, support and build. We read your existing material the way a sceptical buyer would, and note every place the story changes between departments.

You receiveA positioning memo and a list of the contradictions we found.

02

Draw the system

Type, colour, grid, motion and voice decided together rather than in sequence, then tested against the three hardest screens or documents you actually produce.

You receiveA working system file, two applied routes and the reasoning for each.

03

Build the evidence

We produce the real pages, the real templates and the real copy — not a mood deck. Anything that only works in a presentation gets cut here.

You receiveProduction-ready layouts, editorial guidance and component specifications.

04

Hand it over properly

A working session with whoever inherits the system, plus a written record of the decisions so your team can defend them long after we have gone.

You receiveSource files, a usage guide and a recorded walkthrough of the build.

Engagements

Three ways in. Pick the one that matches your decision.

We price by engagement, not by hour, so the scope below is the scope you get. If your situation sits between two of these, say so in the enquiry and we will tell you which one it really is.

DiagnosticEntry point
  • Audit of current brand, site and sales material
  • Six to eight stakeholder interviews
  • Positioning memo with prioritised fixes
  • A costed recommendation for what comes next
CadenceTwo working sessions
LengthTwo to three weeks
Full engagementMost common
  • Everything in the diagnostic
  • Complete identity and interface system
  • Applied templates for your three priority surfaces
  • Editorial voice, naming and core copy
  • Handover session and written decision record
CadenceWeekly review, shared board
LengthSix to fourteen weeks
Studio retainerAfter launch
  • A reserved block of studio days each month
  • New surfaces, campaigns and product screens
  • System maintenance and component additions
  • Review of work produced by your in-house team
CadenceFortnightly, plus async
LengthSix months minimum

Retainers are only offered to organisations we have already completed an engagement with — we would rather know your system before we are asked to maintain it.

Selected work

Three engagements, described the way we would describe them to you.

Each entry names the brief we were actually given and the material we left behind. Client names are withheld while the systems are still rolling out.

01
Notebook, printed charts and pens spread across a table during a strategy session

Specialist lender

A brand that could survive a compliance review

The existing identity had been written for a consumer launch and no longer matched a business selling through brokers. We rebuilt the language first, then the system around it, and tested every claim against what the legal team would actually approve.

Positioning memoIdentity systemBroker portal UIClaim library
02
Designer reviewing page layouts on a large monitor in a quiet studio

Independent publisher

One system for print, screen and the shop

Six imprints had drifted into six visual languages. We drew a single typographic frame flexible enough to hold all of them, then rebuilt the catalogue and the online store on the same grid so a title looks the same wherever a reader meets it.

Typographic frameCover templatesCatalogue redesignStore front end
03
Two colleagues working together at a laptop in a bright workspace

Clinical software

Interface work that cut the reading, not the detail

Clinicians were losing time to dense record screens. We reorganised the information model with the people using it, set a stricter type scale for scanning, and handed the component library to an in-house team that now extends it without us.

Information modelType & density scaleComponent libraryTeam handover

How we work

Good design is mostly an argument that survived being questioned.
  1. We bring the disagreement earlyIf we think the brief is wrong, you hear it in week one, with an alternative attached.
  2. We need one decision-makerNot one meeting of nine people. Consensus review is the single most reliable way to lose a system.
  3. We show unfinished workRough is faster to correct than polished. Expect to see things before they are presentable.
  4. We write before we drawIf the sentence does not hold, no amount of layout will rescue it.
  5. We leave the reasoning behindYour team inherits the decisions, not just the files, so the work can be defended without us in the room.

Before you write

The six questions we are asked in every first call.

Answered here so you can decide whether to contact us at all. If your question is not below, put it in the enquiry and we will answer it directly rather than sending a brochure.

How do you price work?

A fixed fee per engagement, agreed before we start, based on the scope in the engagement table. Diagnostics are quoted from the enquiry alone; full engagements are quoted after a short call, because the number depends on how many surfaces you need applied.

What do you need from us to start?

A named decision-maker, access to the people who sell and support the product, and whatever material already exists — including the things you are not proud of. Those are usually the most useful documents in the room.

Can you work alongside our in-house team?

Yes, and it is our preferred arrangement. We set the system and the reasoning; your team extends it. We will review their output during a retainer, but we do not sit inside your sprint board or attend daily stand-ups.

How quickly can you begin?

We run one engagement at a time, so the honest answer is the date in the studio diary at the top of this page. If that is too far out, we will say so in our reply rather than holding your project in a queue.

Who owns the work when it is finished?

You do — full rights to the identity, the copy and the source files transfer on final payment. We ask only for permission to describe the work in general terms, as we have done above, and we will withhold your name for as long as you need.

Who actually does the work?

The four of us. Nothing is subcontracted without telling you first, and if we bring in a specialist — an illustrator, a front-end engineer — they are named in the proposal before the engagement is signed.

Enquiry

Tell us what is actually going wrong.

A paragraph is enough. We reply to every enquiry ourselves, usually within two working days, and we will tell you plainly if we are the wrong studio for it.

  • Read by the studio, not an inbox
  • No deck, no discovery fee, no pipeline call
  • A clear yes, no, or not yet

We keep what you send between the four of us and use it only to answer you.